a. abrizah penyelidikan, ict & inovasi seminar kebangsaan pustakawan malaysia, melaka, 25-27 ogos 2013 239 jordy, m. l., mcgarth, e. l. & rutledge, j.b. (1999). book reviews as a tool for assessing publisher reputation. college & research libraries, 60(2), 132-142. kellsey, c. & knievel, j. e. (2004).global english in the humanities? a longitudinal citation study of foreign-language use by humanities scholars. college & research libraries, 65(3), 194-204. kousha, k. & thelwall, m. (2009) google book search: citation analysis for social science and the humanities. journal of the american society for information science and technology, 60(8), 1537-1549. kousha, k., thelwall, m. & rezaie, s. (2011). assessing the citation impact of books: the role of google books, google scholar, and scopus. journal of the american society for information science and technology, 62(11), 2147–2164. lindholm-romantschuk, y. (1996). the role of monographs in scholarly communication: an empirical study of philosophy, sociology and economics. journal of documentation, 52(4), 389-404. linmans, a. j. m. (2010). why with bibliometrics the humanities does not need to be the weakest link - indicators for research evaluation based on citations, library holdings, and productivity measures. scientometrics, 83(2), 337-54. mingers, j. & lipitakis, e. a. e. c. g. (2010). counting the citations: a comparison of web of science and google scholar in the field of business and management. scientometrics, 85(2), 613–625 nederhof, a. j. (2006). bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: a review. scientometrics,66(1), 81-100 rauhvargers, a. (2011). global university ranking and their impact.eua reports on ranking 2011. brussels, belgium: european university association. saenger, p. (1975). colard mansion and the evolution of the printed book. the library quarterly, 45(4), 405-18. seol, s.s. & park, j.m. (2008). knowledge sources of innovation studies in korea: a citation analysis. scientometrics, 75(1), 3-20. serenko, a., bontis, n. & moshonsky, m. (2012). books as a knowledge translation mechanism: citation analysis and author survey. journal of knowledge management, 16(3), 495-511. sieber, j. & gradmann, s. (2011). how to best assess monographs? an attempt to assess the impact of monographs using library infrastructure and web 2.0 tools. wp6 report. european educational research quality indicators. 23 p. retrieved from http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/oa/reports/repqfwf2qzfte/pdf/21jn7ac4nh6o.pdf steele, c. (2008). scholarly monograph publishing in the 21st century: the future more than ever should be an open book. the journal of electronic publishing, 11(2). retrieved from http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0011.201?rgn=main;view=fulltext. thompson, j. w. (2002). the death of the scholarly monograph in the humanities? citation patterns in literary scholarship, libri, 52(3),121–136. torres-salinas, d. & moed, h. (2009). library catalog analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: an exploratory study of published book titles in economics. journal of informetrics, 3(1), 9-26 torres-salinas, d., robinson-garcia, n., jimenez-contreras, e. & lopez-corza, e.d. (2012). towards a book publishers citation reports: first approach using the “book citation index”. revista espanola de documentacioncientifica, 35(4), 615- 624 torres-salinas, d., rodríguez-sánchez, r., robinson-garcia, n., fdez-valdivia, j. & garcia, j. a (2013). mapping citation patterns of book chapters in the book citation index. journal of informetrics, 7(2), 412-424. white, h., boell, s. k, yu, h., davis, m., wilson, c. s. & cole, f. t. h. (2009). libcitations: a measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences. journal of the american society for information science and technology, 60(6), 1083-1096. seminar kebangsaan pustakawan malaysia, melaka, 25-27 ogos 2013239